Hey, folks--
Just a note . . .
The short version is that I'm moving this blog to www.curtisshelburne.wordpress.com. Sorry for any inconvenience! And I'd love it if you'd follow me on over there!
I plan to leave the old "archives" here, but the new entries will be at the new location (where I've also been posting for awhile).
If you'd like, I'd love it if you'd also check out a new website I'm building at www.curtisshelburne.com. I'm hoping to be shamelessly marketing a music CD by "Yours Truly" soon.
Thanks so much!
Curtis
Monday, July 16, 2012
Wednesday, July 4, 2012
Swimming in a Shark Tank Is Thought-provoking
Very, very little about “reality
TV” is real.
Put a little lipstick on a pit
bull and you’ll have something a lot more “real” and a good deal nicer than,
for example, supposedly “real housewives” who are mostly collagen, silicone,
high maintenance attitude, and genuinely devoid of anything genuine. But such
mind-numbing voyeuristic freak show TV replicates itself at an astounding rate.
“Real Housewives of Paducah”?
I suppose the “Shark Tank” series
on ABC is a kind of reality TV, so I feel a little embarrassed when I’m
swimming by flipping channels and that show occasionally snags me. I’ve gotten
hooked a few times.
On “Shark Tank” a panel of
“sharks,” successful (whatever that is) business folks who have achieved the
kind of amazing success (whatever that is) that we all are supposed to desire,
listen to pitches by fledgling entrepreneurs hoping to enlist some serious
denarii to take their businesses or business ideas onward and upward to serious
success (whatever that is).
The “sharks” are brutal in their
examination of the entrepreneurs and their products/ideas. But if the sharks
are convinced that the pitch has merit, they’ll offer bunches of money to the
entrepreneurs (and often compete or join with each other in doing so) to get
the business funded or seriously expand it. In return, they get an agreed upon
share in the company and a percentage of its income.
I’ll admit, it’s interesting to
watch. The business ideas are interesting, as are the entrepreneurs themselves
and the evaluation of the “sharks.” If I were starting a business, I hope I’d
be open to frank counsel from someone who has successfully done so.
But swimming with sharks has some
inherent dangers, and it brings up some questions.
I know our society always equates
success with an impressive spreadsheet and “bigger and more.” Is that all it
takes to be a “success”? Is there ever a time to wisely say, “Enough”?
If you’ve got a really great idea
and your product is already selling pretty well, do you really want to get in
bed with a shark? (Mixed metaphor, I know.) Can you ever really trust a shark?
Is working with one much fun even if it produces more dollars? How much is
happiness worth to you? Even if the shark is pretty honest, have you ever known
a big personality/big money shark who didn’t always honestly think that any
success in a joint venture was because of him and any setbacks because of his
much less savvy partner(s)? Have you ever met a shark who wasn’t at least a
little, and probably a lot, dangerous?
I wonder how many of these sharks
bought their “success” with a long line of wrecked relationships and broken
families? Is that a price you’d be willing to pay? Who and what are you willing
to sacrifice on the altar of your “success”?
Our society’s definition of
success is one thing; we do well to think long and hard about God’s definition.
That’s a reality check you won’t find on “reality” TV.
Copyright 2012 by Curtis K. Shelburne.
Permission to copy without altering text or for monetary gain is hereby granted
subject to inclusion of this copyright notice.
Monday, June 18, 2012
To Beard or Not To Beard: That Is the Question
A gentleman by the name of Maynard Good Stoddard wrote an article
for The Saturday Evening Post many moons ago which my brother, for some
reason, sent my way. It is entitled “To Beard or Not To Beard.”
Mr. Stoddard said that one day he finally figured out why he had
been pushed around at home for so many years. It was, he had discovered,
because his chin lacked authority. He mentioned that he felt no need for one of
those “Jay Leno jobs.” But he felt a definite need for something a bit more
along that very distinctive line. It evidently occurred to him that though chin
augmentation through plastic surgery might be pricey, whiskers are more or less
free. And they do indeed change the character of a chin (and maybe even the
chin of a character). A research project on beards was soon underway.
First, Stoddard polled his wife. She said she’d rather “embrace a
camel’s hair pillow than a face full of whiskers,” a feeling evidently shared
by a Mrs. Abner Billings (now a former Mrs. Billings) whose husband divorced
her because she kept spraying his beard down with disinfectant which got into
his eyes. The divorce court judge suggested “mowing the hay,” but Mr. Billings
countered that the beard was more of a comfort to him than was Mrs. Billings.
According to Stoddard, “Beards have been causing domestic wars
ever since wives discovered that whiskers could be mowed, shaven, or set on
fire.”
And Stoddard discovered a good deal more in his research.
It was Alexander the Great who first “shot down the beard,”
ordering his soldiers to shave lest their manly chins provide the enemy with
convenient handholds.
A case could be made that by shaving his beard Louis VIII of
France started a war with England that lasted 300 years. The beard-trimming was
objected to by his wife, the famous Eleanor of Aquitaine. After their divorce,
she married Henry II of England who had a beard he could “tuck into his belt on
windy days.”
During the reign of Henry I, Serle the bishop, termed the bearded
gents of the Norman English court “filthy goats and bristly Saracens.”
According to Stoddard’s research, Peter the Great levied a tax (“a
sir-tax”?) on Russian beards. King Charles swept the points of his moustache
upward and sported a beard shaped like a downward flame. Edward II’s beard was
long and patriarchal. Henry VIII’s was knotted. The Roman Emperor Hadrian grew
one to cover his warts.
Beards. I’m pretty sure that God, unlike most wives, is neutral on
the subject. What comes out of our hearts is far more important to him than
what graces or disgraces, as the case may be, our chins.
Copyright 2012 by Curtis K. Shelburne.
Permission to copy without altering text or for monetary gain is hereby granted
subject to inclusion of this copyright notice.
Monday, June 11, 2012
The God of the Universe Is Our Father
Christians are united as
brothers and sisters spiritually by the very same truth that makes siblings brothers and sisters
physically—they have the same father (well, Father, in this case).
What an amazing blessing!
God is our Father!
It is not simply that God
gives us physical life, though he does, and in that sense God is the Father of
everyone, but God is our Father in that he gives his believing children a new
kind of life, a spiritual life which, unlike biological life, will never fade
but is fit for eternity.
The two gifts of life,
for which biblical Greek has two completely different words, are similar.
Biological life and spiritual life look alike, but, as C. S. Lewis writes, they
are actually as different as night and day. One is a photo of a place; the
other, the real place. One is the statue of a human being; the other, the
actual living person.
The business of
Christianity is to impart to human beings genuine life, the life of God which
comes only by grace through faith in Jesus Christ.
“This world,” Lewis
writes, “is a great sculptor’s shop. We are the statues and there is a rumour
going round the shop that some of us are some day going to come to life.”
The difference, you see,
between mere biological life and spiritual life is the difference between a “carved
stone” and a living, breathing human.
Our God is the greatest
King, but it was no royal nobility which caused him to send his Son to give
real life to you and to me.
Our God is the most
powerful Judge, but no legal demands of any law—and certainly no merit on our
part—obligated him to freely extend life and mercy to any of us.
Our God is the most
masterful Creator, but nothing in his great creative energy forced him to
fashion sons and daughters out of statues.
But thank God himself that
God is also our Father, and out of his deep Father’s love for his children he
extends to us freely the blessings of genuine life, life fashioned to be able
to experience an eternity of Joy.
No description of God is
as expressive or beautiful or full of meaning as this: God is our Father.
Copyright 2012 by Curtis K. Shelburne. Permission to
copy without altering text or for monetary gain is hereby granted subject to
inclusion of this copyright notice.
Saturday, June 2, 2012
Just Thinking About "Time in a Bottle"
“What is a grain of wheat?” Paul Tournier asks. “It contains a whole plant you cannot yet see. What is a silkworm? You cannot define it without seeing in advance all its metamorphosis. What is a child? You cannot describe him without thinking of the whole life of the man, with all its unknowns, for which he is preparing.”
As I first read those words years ago, I sat at my desk and examined the little Christmas present I had just received from my mother. It was a simple little thing—a small bottle with a glass stopper. Inside were ten or fifteen marbles. She’d tied a thin baby blue ribbon around the little bottle.
Once it was a vitamin bottle, but now it was becoming a very special paperweight. I remembered the marbles, every one. They were mine, or at least they had been.
The bottle? The bottle once sat on the small table by my aged maternal grandparents’ bed in the old house at Robert Lee, Texas. It had held just enough water to use to take a pill or to wet a dry throat.
Dr. Tournier writes of the metamorphosis, the transformation, we see when caterpillars are changed into butterflies and blonde-headed little boys into graying grandfathers. That little bottle is for me an appropriate symbol of the process. Nestled inside the glass bottle of the aged are the glass trinkets of childhood. Thus encapsulated by a marble-filled bottle is the whole spectrum of life from spring to winter, from youth to old age.
No one is immune to the metamorphosis wrought by time. With each tick of the clock every one of us is being transformed. Tournier is right. We see a small child and wonder what the adult will be like. We wonder about the many unknowns life holds for graduates walking across the stage. We each, no matter what our age, remember what we ourselves have been and ponder what we may yet become. The present flits into the past on the wings of a hyperactive hummingbird, and we are powerless to slow it down or grasp it into stillness. The future races to meet us with blinding speed, oppressed with such a low opinion of itself that it can’t wait to change its name to “The Past.”
But Christians needn’t be frightened of the frenetic future or paralyzed by the echoes of the past. We are all being changed, but God’s children know that the transformation can be filled with joy and hope. Our Creator promises to lovingly fill our lives with His life, continually re-creating us by Resurrection power, changing us “into Christ’s likeness from one degree of glory to another” (2 Corinthians 3:18).
Copyright 2012 by Curtis K. Shelburne. Permission to copy without altering text or for monetary gain is hereby granted subject to inclusion of this copyright notice.
Monday, May 28, 2012
Freedom Is a Costly and Precious Gift
I am writing this column on a beautiful and calm morning. It’s a holiday, and I’m planning to be seriously involved in doing almost nothing serious today.
I’ve watered the fresh concrete in my driveway, trying to help it cure slowly and hoping to get it to grow. So far, that’s worked.
I’m sitting on the back patio, life-giving coffee and a deadly pellet gun on the table by my side. The coffee? Well, everyone knows it’s foolish to try to write without coffee. And the pellet gun? Well, grackles occasionally show up to try to eat my dog food and chase off civilized birds. I’ve heard some of those nasty grackle-birds are endangered. I doubt it, but with all of my heart, I hope so. They’ll be more endangered if my aim is good today.
Today is Memorial Day. It’s a special day when we especially remember the sacrifice of those who have risked, and many lost, their lives and liberty to keep us free. To remember means to think.
Being still and enjoying time like this is something we should do more of. Thinking tends to happen on the rare occasions when we stop “doing” long enough to think about what we’re doing and why we’re doing it.
As I was thinking some this morning about those who have given life and liberty to safeguard the life and liberty which are God’s gifts to us, I thought of a short radio speech given almost 90 years ago in England.
Winston Churchill was talking about “The Causes of War.” He said that many people are convinced that the best way to avoid war is to “dwell upon its horrors,” to spend a lot of time talking about and focusing visually and rhetorically on the horrible cost of war in bloodshed and suffering. Yes, he said, such focus may indeed have genuine value in keeping civilized people from invading and subjugating other nations.
But it is very little help at all when rogue nations with power hungry and blood-thirsty leaders attack others. As we now know, to endlessly negotiate with a Hitler is as effective on the world scene as giving moving speeches on the playground to the school bully. Bullies like to talk. It gives them more time to brutalize the weak, and is very encouraging to them as it proves beyond any doubt the weakness of the speaker.
Oh, yes, Churchill allowed, it’s a fine thing to remind ourselves never to attack and pillage other peace-loving nations and to negotiate solutions to reasonable differences with other civilized nations.
But how do you effectively deal with nations who laugh at the idea of freedom and whose brutal and truly evil leaders gobble up and enslave nation after nation? Very differently.
Freedom is God’s gift to us, and it is precious. Thank God for all those, and their families, who have paid a very real price so that we can live in a land with mornings like this one.
Copyright 2012 by Curtis K. Shelburne. Permission to copy without altering text or for monetary gain is hereby granted subject to inclusion of this copyright notice.
Monday, May 21, 2012
It's No Secret: I Love the Church!
I love the church! Not just (just?) the church universal, that marvelous and miraculous Body of Christ composed of all God’s children, everyone who ever has or ever will wear Christ’s name, all the sons and daughters of God . . . Oh, I love “that” church, too.
But I also love the local expressions of that Body, the little bands of disciples—all of them small indeed compared to the grand Body from which they spring—working in a million places to glorify God and share Christ’s love. I love the church.
Oh, I know, loving the church is not always in style. Lots of “Baby Boomers” like me, sentenced to too much time in the 60s and 70s, find it hard to trust any institution. (And it IS unwise to completely trust the human side of even a divine institution.) Some folks, also like me, grew up in “separatist” traditions or groups who tended to talk more about “the church” than they did about the Lord of the church.
For lots of reasons, it’s easy to lose respect for the church as seen in her all-too-human local expressions. Some lose respect for the church in general because many churches are small, and our culture only respects “large.” Some folks point to little churches that seem short-sighted and poorly “run.” And some are. Some lose respect because some large churches seem so plastic and choreographed that they feel fake. Yes, and some are, and could put on a fine show without God at all.
And we all know that when bad things happen in the church, the spectacle is particularly unseemly. When a church gets caught up in power struggles all dressed up as pious piffle, or divides and walls itself off from the rest of the Body over molehills of supposed “doctrine” masquerading as mountains . . . When “issues” prance around like the old naked emperor with no clothes, most sensible folks (in the church or outside it) see how bad that looks. It’s like a hairy wart on Miss America’s nose or, sadder still, a cow patty dropped on top of a luscious cheesecake. It’s all the more ugly because we know how beautiful it can and should be.
But I still love the church. I’ve seen her beauty. I’ve felt the warmth of her embrace and seen the depth of her love, and the very best blessings of my life have been gifts from the Lord given through her hands.
I love the church, and I love the little church I’m a part of, and I hope you love yours. Through our doors and into our “family” have come F-16 pilots and janitors, 4-pound newborns and 103-year-old little ladies, teachers and farmers and brand new parents and brand new great-grandparents and . . . Well, an amazingly diverse group of folks!
Each Sunday young families do the hard work of rounding up and dressing up the precious little rug-rats and heading through these doors. Much older folks navigate via walker and wheelchair to these pews. Folks in every stage of life between infancy and antiquity come in to honor their Lord, to be a blessing and to receive a blessing.
And yet again I am amazed at what the Lord of the church does in the lives of his people.
I love the church!
Copyright 2012 by Curtis K. Shelburne. Permission to copy without altering text or for monetary gain is hereby granted subject to inclusion of this copyright notice.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)